Regrettably this point is missed and its a single problem sadly. Afk in reduced sec doesn't matter imo. Allowing that at null long-term would ruin sov/econ equilibrium. Additionally I dont understand the expectation of having any security whatsoever in a region named"null security". Of all the ways they might have clarified areas in Eve, the one that they believed was the best describes the expectation of EVE Mobile ISK security.Exactly, and also you can afk autopath in protected zones and make lots money. Why can't you guys have your safe zone and let's have our risky zone? It would break the match if individuals were allowed to fly in nul free of consequence.Because the match was better and had more players before, this just carers to the eve online failures which are on echoes such as mouthbreathers over your shoulder.If by fly you mean having the ability to EVE Echoes Isk Buy do anything in null and get away via autopilot I concur with you.but the reality is we only need to reach the destination secure. Everything that occurs afterward is on us. And we understand that.But what you aren't wanting is a zone that is risky, you want gotcha loot pulls ships that are afk. If you truly wanted a insecure zone you'd welcome people being able to get to your area without difficulty. Because then they are in your space and your ownprey.
