https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dyrjv6U-dY4Recently, a netizen named "Ark and China" published an article titled "Objective Evaluation of Xi Jinping" on the "Lingering Garden" forum, which aroused extensive discussion among netizens and even the media. Compared with the word "objective" in the title, the article is more like an interesting literary work. The author analyzes various phenomena during Xi Jinping's ten years in power, and subjectively describes Xi Jinping's psychology and personality a lot, and also compares Bo Xilai with Xi Jinping. However, judging from the author's preference for Bo Xilai in the article, as well as the point of view in another similar article "Objective Evaluation of Bo Xilai", the author is likely to be a fan of Bo Xilai.Although the article is full of the author's subjective assumptions, at best it can only be regarded as a non-serious comment, and a large number of similar articles can be found on the Internet, but the author still uses outstanding literary talent, solid political knowledge and witty deduction techniques. , which makes this article stand out from many similar articles.The explosion of the article immediately attracted the attention of people from all walks of life. First, major democrats and commentators entrenched in the Internet appeared on the stage. It seemed that they had found the anti-CCP traffic code, and used the word "objective" in the title to borrow the topic. The former professor of the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China reposted the article many times, and invited people to discuss "different views" together to "gain more insights." Commentator Han Lianchao published an article "My Views on Xi Jinping's merits and crimes in the past years". First, he expressed his anti-CCP views as always. At the end of the article, he did not forget to mention that he should create opportunities for China's peaceful and democratic transition and build his image as a so-called democratic fighter.However, what is surprising is that an article full of subjectivity and obvious bias will attract widespread attention from major media, and they will all end up expressing their opinions. The Epoch Times, a media founded by Fa Lun Gong, published an article titled “From Anti-Xi Jinping Long Articles to Bo Xilai” to report on the article, and analyzed the reasons for Bo Xilai’s downfall, but finally concluded it as clinging to Jiang Zemin and supporting him. It is self-evident that his political intentions are self-evident. The right-wing media "Voice of America" is concerned about the outcome of Xi Jinping predicted in the article, and believes that China's future is "the building will collapse." The website "Watch China" published an article announcing the struggle within the CCP, and added the word "First Release" to the title.If you want to objectively evaluate the article "Objective Evaluation of Xi Jinping", it is indeed neatly written and full of content, but the objectiveness probably only exists in the title. The popularity of the article was unexpected, and major media and celebrities came in to speak one after another. Whether it is to export values with private goods, or to seize the time to gain popularity, it is a long time ago to use an article that is not objective as a starting point to discuss objectively. It has deviated from the word objective, only the carnival of netizens, the media, and spectators.
