Ok, so to begin with, I am not likely to discuss Tencent or their business practices with firms that they acquire. I'm not sure anything about this and also have pointless to doubt GGG's official explanation. The 2 problems that I actually do have are actually more general and connect with anybody buying out GGG. But to get at these problems, there are two key questions you should ask: 1: Why did GGG want to market (ok, technically accept a good investment in return for a big part stake in) the organization to begin with? The only real factor within the official publish would be a general "to provide us with the sources to create Road to Exile nearly as good as possible." However, does which means that that GGG wasn't any longer remaining within the black, or just searching for any large lump sum payment to create a large immediate investment into the game? 2: Why would Tencent (or any organization) be interested GGG? If the solution to # 1 was that GGG wasn't remaining afloat, then your only need to acquire it's if Tencent will considerably change GGG's business practices (cost cutting and/or revenue increase). Obviously, the official publishes particularly denied that Tencent could be hands-on, which means this chain of reasoning is not possible. With this assumption, we are playing the concept that Tencent saw a chance to create an advanced budgeting (give GGG a lot of money to enhance the sport), using the reward being profit with time appearing out of GGG to Tencent to be able to pay back an investment (and several quantity of profit). Also to see: Top 10 Starter Builds for POE 3.3 Incursion League Now, by itself, and presuming that things are above-board, this might theoretically be copacetic. If GGG and Tencent clearly check this out being an investment that will allow GGG to create more profit compared to what they presently do, and the quantity of profit that Tencent will get from their majority stake in GGG is under or comparable to the quantity of elevated profit that GGG generates from stated investment, everybody wins. We obtain a much better game free of charge, GGG will get elevated (or at best equal) money to operate the sport, and Tencent makes some kind of profit from their investment. However, then we reach my two concerns: 1) Why did not GGG achieve to the gamer base in regards to this -- with the idea to solicit investment from us, or at best to gauge players' opinions around the matter? I, for just one, could have been more than pleased to purchase the organization -- even when it did not produce any kind of personal possession stake, but rather, say, a kind of pooled 'player' possession stake. Now, clearly, this is not complete. It is possible that players wouldn't happen to be prepared to fork over how much money that Tencent was. It is also entirely possible that players could have been unhappy with the thought of Tencent obtaining GGG, but GGG would have made the decision to manoeuvre forward. It's their game, their company, as well as their decision. But at the minimum, they might have made a decision equipped with the foreknowledge of player reactions, so we (the player base) might have felt that GGG was thinking about our opinions on which is very probably the greatest decision that the organization makes since its founding. 2) What goes on if whether) my assumptions above regarding questions 1 and a pair of are wrong, or B) everything doesn't exercise perfectly? The risks of the are fairly apparent -- GGG got purchased with a bad-belief actor, and we're at least inside a worse position than ever before, and also at worst, the entire game goes to crap quickly. However, that will also require us to visualize that GGG is either incompetent or screwing the sport (and also the players by extension) over purposely, and I believe they a minimum of deserving the advantage of the doubt on accounts granted their performance during the last >5 years. What if B happens? At the best, GGG is within a worse position, as they'll be compelled to extract Tencent's investment at the expense of the healthiness of PoE (namely, they'll see less internet profit that to build up PoE). Inside a more moderate situation, GGG will really need to downsize to reduce overhead to be able to stay lucrative. As well as in a worst-situation scenario, Tencent will ultimately close the lid on to extract whatever share of the investment that they'll -- either closing the organization and parting it, or selling it to a 3rd party, who will not be bound through the hands-off agreement that Tencent apparently has with GGG. Now, I wish to be obvious -- I am not to imply that any one of this will occur. I am not really claiming that my logic is ironclad or that even my premises are 100% accurate. But in line with the information which we have received, it is a worrying situation, so that as Personally, I see the money which I invest in PoE like a donation to GGG since I similar to their game, and most importantly, their business design and ethics, it's given me pause. I am talking about, even presuming that everything's around the up-and-up (which, again, is exactly what I am moving with), I simply do not feel exactly the same need to donate if, say, 80% of my money will GGG, and 20% with a Chinese bankroller. That's not saying which I do not feel any desire, exactly that it is something that does wreck havoc on the equation. So, what you can do about this? Well, let us rock 2 options again since it appears like all portion of this godforsaken wall of text has already established 2 parts up till now. 1) GGG, please provide us with more details. I am talking about, I receive it -- it is your business, and you haven't any obligation to reveal stuff towards the public. In some instances, it could be also upon your interests to do this. Acknowledging some kind of financial troubles or instance the investment has been accustomed to bootstrap a brand new project (PoE's successor, or perhaps an entirely new game) could cause player disengagement and hurt your revenue stream. There are many some other reasons to help keep some things within the lid. But being released and telling us something that 'they gave us money, there is a majority stake now, try not to be worried about it' would actually assistance to allay our fears. Something similar to an extensive-stroke summary of the reasoning behind GGG seeking investment, or even the basics of the arrangement with Tencent. 2) Playerbase and GGG, let us really meet up to speak about these items -- both with regards to the present situation and later on. Will it be feasible for us, players, to purchase the organization (either to acquire possession stake or otherwise)? Could we buy a big enough stake to, not really control, but say obtain a 20 or 30% curiosity about it? Say enough that nobody party includes a controlling share any longer, and a minimum of 2 from the (presumably) 3 blocks (GGG, Tencent, and players) would form a big part? And when this type of factor was possible, how could we really do it? Clearly, GGG is not likely to sell small percentages of possession to a large number of different players (that's basically issuing stocks with an open exchange), and players could not coordinate their voting in almost any significant means by the initial place, so possibly setup an LLC, having a well-respected person in the city since it's director to represent our interests? (note: I'm not suggesting the community be hands-up with telling GGG how to proceed with a possession share) Anyway, individuals are simply my ideas. Shall We Be Held alone? Do other people have similar concerns (or proposals), or have you got some which I missed? You know, I always buy PoE currency from R4PG, which is an online store that offerig Path of Exile Currency service for years.